Comments on: UNDER WHERE? http://www.personaldebris.com/2004/09/13/under-where/ for all of life's detritus... Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:39:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: lucy http://www.personaldebris.com/2004/09/13/under-where/#comment-61 lucy Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:54:37 +0000 http://www.personaldebris.com/2004/09/13/under-where/#comment-61 http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0957-0233/13/2/304 there's the abstract of the longer paper on the method--it uses electrical field sensors instead of electrical potential sensors as used in traditional electrode-based ECG. haven't seen it in real life, but the data looks amazing. sounds like an ideal solution to a really important problem in wearables! (can you tell i'm excited about this? :)) ps thanx for the kind words :) http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0957-0233/13/2/304

there’s the abstract of the longer paper on the method–it uses electrical field sensors instead of electrical potential sensors as used in traditional electrode-based ECG. haven’t seen it in real life, but the data looks amazing. sounds like an ideal solution to a really important problem in wearables! (can you tell i’m excited about this? :))

ps thanx for the kind words :)

]]> By: jessica http://www.personaldebris.com/2004/09/13/under-where/#comment-62 jessica Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:53:13 +0000 http://www.personaldebris.com/2004/09/13/under-where/#comment-62 after a weirdo grabbed my boob on the manhattan bridge i wanted to invent an electro bra that would shock the grabber - i doubt that would be legal after a weirdo grabbed my boob on the manhattan bridge i wanted to invent an electro bra that would shock the grabber - i doubt that would be legal

]]> By: lucy http://www.personaldebris.com/2004/09/13/under-where/#comment-63 lucy Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:22:44 +0000 http://www.personaldebris.com/2004/09/13/under-where/#comment-63 been done :) http://www.no-contact.com/ been done :)
http://www.no-contact.com/

]]>